Home | Ask Your Question | Mortgage Glossary
Find me a lender for:  

Refinance to Lower the Mortgage Payment:Good Idea?

Refinance to Lower the Mortgage Payment:Good Idea?

April 5, 2004, Revised November 17, 2004

Refinancing a mortgage at a higher interest rate may be necessary to raise badly needed cash, or to reduce monthly payments you can no longer afford, but it will make you poorer in the long-term. That includes proposals to invest the savings in monthly payment, such as this one.

�I have a recently purchased home, with a $180,000 mortgage for 15 years at 4.63%. My new investment advisor suggests refinancing into a new 30-year mortgage at 5.85% to 6%, and investing the difference in payment. He says this will allow us to retire sooner. I am 61 and was planning on retiring at 66. I understand his argument but I hate to give up the ultra low 4.6% interest rate and the peace of mind of paying off the house sooner.�

Your investment advisor is either an idiot or a scoundrel. He is a scoundrel if the new loan he wants to put you into is one in which he has a financial interest.  

On a $180,000 loan, the monthly payment at 5.85% for 30-years is about $327 less than at 4.63% for 15 years. Extending the term to 30 years reduces the payment by more than the higher rate increases it. Your investment advisor wants you to invest that $327, arguing that you will be better off down the road if you do.

You will be better off if the investment fund you accumulate over time becomes larger than the difference between the loan balance you will have at that time, and the smaller balance you would have had if you kept the lower-rate and shorter-term mortgage. For example, if you accumulate $20,000 after 5 years and your loan balance is only $5,000 higher at that time than it would have been, you would be $15,000 ahead.

In fact, there is virtually no chance of your coming out ahead. Over your time horizon of 5 years, you would have to earn more than 38% a year to make this happen.  If you are in the 27% tax bracket, you would have to earn more than 24% after tax.  If you hold to the strategy for 10 years, the required returns drop to 20% before-tax and 13% after-tax. These returns are still far higher than any available on investments your advisor can put you into.   

I calculated these returns, as you can, from calculator 15a on my web site.  The calculations ignore any refinancing costs. These would make the proposed strategy look even worse. 

I have yet to find a legitimate exception to the following rule: "Refinancing into a higher-rate loan reduces your wealth."  Read also Can Mortgage Refinance at a Higher Rate Make Sense?

Copyright Jack Guttentag 2004

 

Jack Guttentag is Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Visit the Mortgage Professor's web site for more answers to commonly asked questions.

Search More Info On:

  • investments
  • mortgage payment
  • payments calculator
  • payment calculator
  • house payment calculator
  • mortgage calculator down payment
  • Shop For Your Mortgage Now!
    Shop For Your Mortgage Now!

    You'll be re-directed to Top-Lenders.com

     


    Related Articles From Mortgage Professor's web site:

    Is Unused Home Equity a "Missed Fortune"?
    18 July 2005 "I don?t understand why a Wharton professor would not recognize that unused home equity is a missed opportunity? Isn?t home equity safer in a conservative side fund than buried in the house earning a 0 percent return?" The New and Old Wisdoms of ... more...

    The Wrap-Around Mortgage Scam
    February 18, 2003 "A local firm has offered to refinance our existing 6.75% mortgage, which has a balance of $100,000. On our behalf, they will arrange for another lender to provide us with a cash-out refinance of $150,000 at 4.875% for 15-years. Three days after settlement, we take ... more...

    Pros and Cons of Paying Cash for a House
    April 22, 2002 "We are turning 50 and soon will be selling our house to buy another. We have no savings aside from the equity in our current house, which is approximately $180,000. We plan to work for another 15 years, during which time we will have available about $1500 a ... more...

    Pros and Cons of Using Securities as Down Payment
    June 7, 1999 "I can either put 20% down to avoid mortgage insurance, or I can invest the 20% in stock held by my broker, who would then finance 100% of the value of the house with no mortgage insurance. Assuming the rate and points are the same, is the broker plan a ... more...


    More on invest...